The APICULTURAL SOCIETY OF KOREA
1

Current Issue

Journal of Apiculture - Vol. 33 , No. 3

[ Original Article ]
Journal of Apiculture - Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.71-76
Abbreviation: J.Apic.
ISSN: 1225-0252 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2018
Received 11 Apr 2018 Revised 17 Jun 2018 Accepted 26 Jun 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17519/apiculture.2018.06.33.2.71

Indigenous Knowledge and Practices of Beekeeping with Apis cerana in Nepal
Rameshwor Pudasaini*
Department of Entomology, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Correspondence to : * E-mail: rameshwor@iaas.edu.np


Abstract

Economically five important honeybees’ species namely Apis cerana F., A. mellifera L., A. laboriosa S., A. dorsata F., and A. florae F. are recorded in Nepal. To understand the farmers’ indigenous knowledges and practices on beekeeping, a survey was conducted in Nepal in 2015/016. Farmers searched honeybee colonies in hollow tree around the forest and domesticated them bykeeping two-three bee hives made of traditional wood log bee hives of A. cerana in a house with least management practices. Majority of the farmers (74%) harvested honey two times in a year, between March to May and second September to November. The techniques of beekeeping had been handed down from generation to generation since immemorial time.Indigenous knowledge and practices could be an important basis for the development of beekeeping and maintenance of beekeeping in rural areas of Nepal.


Keywords: A. cerana, Domestication, Traditional log hives, Indigenous knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Five different honeybee species are recorded in the Hindu Kush Himalayan region (Partap, 1997). Three important honeybee species, little bee (A. florea), rock bee (A. dorsata) and Asian bee (A. cerana) are commonly found in Nepal (Kafle, 1992) and the largest honeybee (A. laboriosa) is also found in the mountain regions. Similarly, beekeeping with A. mellifera started since 1993-1995 (MoAc, 2008; Entomology Division, 1999).

The indigenous hive bee of Asia, A. cerana, is the most valuable natural resources of beekeeping in Hindu-Kush Himalayan region and has been considered as vital component of the natural ecosystem (Joshi et al., 2001). It is reported that A. cerana can be found throughout Nepal up to 3500 masl (Gurung et al., 2012). Different studies reported that A. cerana is an excellent pollinator of many crops that improves the quality and quantity (Partap and Partap, 1997; Pudasaini and Thapa, 2014a; Pudasaini et al., 2014). Similarly, A. cerana is reported efficient pollinator as compared to A. mellifera and A. dorsata in natural condition (Pudasaini and Thapa, 2014b).

Traditional beekeeping is a part of cultural heritage in Nepal and has been practiced by rural people since ancient times (Devkota, 2000; Kafle, 1992). Many Nepalese farmers engaged in beekeeping enterprise since long times (Ranabhat, 2010). However, it is reported that population of A. cerana in Hindu-Kush region is declining (Verma, 1992; Partap, 1999). In the other hand, A. mellifera beekeeping requires more resources, capital and management which are unsuitable for subsistent rural beekeepers (Ahmad et al., 2002). Similarly, the role of indigenous knowledge could be important for development of beekeeping sector (Saville and Upadhaya, 2002). Various studies were conducted regarding to the beekeeping in Nepal (Kafle, 1992; Saville and Upadhaya, 2002). But it lacks to collect information regarding to the indigenous knowledge and practices of beekeeping at farmers level. Hence, it is necessary to document the available indigenous knowledges and practices of beekeeping for its further improvementand development of the beekeeping sector. Therefore, this study was carried out to collect theinformation regarding toindigenous knowledge and practicesof farmers’ on beekeeping.


METHODOLOGY

A survey was conducted at Chyangli VDC, Gorkha district, Nepal from December, 2015 to May, 2016 to collect information about the indigenous knowledge and practices on beekeeping where 2~3 honeybee hives with A. cerana is common. Surveyed areas have longitude 84.46450E, latitude 27.98360N and elevation 2,674 feet with subtropical climate.

Focus group discussions (FGD) were used to collect necessary information (Krueger 1988; Etkin 1993). First model group discussion was conducted to set the objectives and questionnaire. After identifying the main objectives as to collect information onindigenous knowledges and practices of beekeeping, key questionnaire and agenda were finalized. Then the focus group discussions with stakeholder were held in different five study centres Chyangli, Gorkha (Biruwatar, Majhuwa, Khatritar, Jwoithan, Purnepipal) each consisting of 10~20 stakeholders based on geographical location, ethnicity, socio-economic status, age (30 years to 65 years), interest etc. The discussions were mainly focused on the following: 1) Importance of honeybees and honey, 2) Collection of bee 3) Traditional log hives 4) Honey harvesting 5) Management of honeybee and 6) Problem of beekeeping which were noted during discussion period.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Importance of honeybees and honey

Majority of the respondents (72%) (N=75) were found aware about the roles of honeybees as a crop pollinator and maintaining sound ecosystem. A proverb was found famous in these regions as ‘killing one bee equals the sin of killing seven cows’. As they believed cow as a goddess in Hindu culture. Similarly, importance of honey was reported as a very essence material in daily life from birth to death. They licked honey on the ceremony of ‘rice feeding’ at six months of child born. Honeyhas been using as a medicine and nutritional food sinceimmemorial time.In the study area, they used honey as one of the constituent of immortality (called Panchamrit) along with other four constituents. The knowledge acquired by the farmers of study area on importance of honey and beekeeping is similar to previous studies who reported that honeybees are important pollinators (Pudasaini and Thapa, 2014a; Pudasaini et al., 2014; Partap and Verma, 2010; Munawar et al., 2009; Robinson and Morse, 1989). Similarly, in Hinduism, the honey (Maha/Madhu) is one of the five in gredients of Panchamrit (drinks of gods) (Oldroyd and Wongsiri, 2006; Joshi, 2008). Likewise, when a child is born in a Hindu family “Jatakarma” is performed to welcome thechild into the new family, by putting some drops ofhoney in the child’s mouth and whispering the name of God in the child’s ear (B. B. C., 2009).

Collection of bee

Farmers searched honeybee colonies in hollow tree trunk in forest area. They sliced these trunks with the help of locally made axe (locally called bancharo) and transfer them in bamboo basket (locally called dalo) and relocated them in traditional log bee hives or wall hives. Majority of the farmer (78%) (N=75) were found poured small amount of sugar syrup in hives after shifting bee in hives from bamboo basket. Very few farmers (6%) also found practiced tying queen with thread in hives for few days,to force honeybees toinhabit in hives. Sometimes they also captured swarming or absconding bee which temporary dwell openly on tree branches. They believed that if this collection process is done in Wednesday, honeybees doesn’t absconds the hive and inhabit for longer time. Similarly, they also captured absconding honeybees by thronging fine soil or water in natural condition. Present finding was in the line with earlier reports in collection of bees. Joshi et al. (2002) also argued that people used to catch swarm bees and keep in locally designed log or wall hives. Kafle (1992) also reported that farmers in Nepal caught stray swarm bee of A. cerana and started new colonies.

Traditional log hives

The cylindrical hives with hollowed-out logs were common in study area.Majority of log hives were made from timber species such as Shorea robusta (Sal), Lagerstroemia parviflora (locally Bot dhaiyero), Schima wallichi (Schima), Castanopsis indica (Chest nut) and Terminalia arjuna (Arjun tree) with well seasoned parts. The months of December-January were an appropriate time for making hives, particularly on Wednesday. They believed that hives constructed at that time was both durable as well as honeybees reside for longer duration. Similarly, wood borer infestation was found least on these hives. They search hollow tree or tree trunk to made hive and cut it into hive sized logs (2 to 2.5 feet). One or two hole is positioned at the mid-point from the both end. Two openings of the hive are closed with special kind of tools (locally called ‘Chitreto’) made with bamboo peel (or sometime also with plank) after transferring honeybee into hives. These Chitreto were plastered using red soil (Fig. 1). The Chitreto is porous in nature which permits circulation of air from one end of hive to another. The length of log hives is usually about 2 to 2.5 feet with 1feet diameter. The log hives were hanged in the balcony with the help of rope (Fig. 2).They also reared honeybees in the wall hives which is locally called ‘Khopa’. These hives were recesses in walls of houses and created at the time of building of houses. The recesses are planked and plastered with mud paste (especially red soil) from inside the house, while they open to the outside with small round holes serving as bee entrance. But this type of hive was not common in surveyed areas. Thapa (2003) also reported similar result on length (2~2.5 feet) and diameter (1~1.5 feet) of hives. Similarly, according to Pokhrel (2009), farmers kept A. cerana in traditional log and wall hives in hilly area of Chitwan. The rearing of honeybee in wall hives and log hives were also described by Kafle (1992).


Fig. 1. 
Closed opening of hive with bamboo peel tooland plastered with red soil in Nepal.


Fig. 2. 
Hanginglog hives in the balcony of house with help of rope in Nepal.

Honey harvesting

A smoker locally called ‘Jhumro’ is made out of old cotton cloth tied into a roll. During honey harvesting, about two-third (70%) farmer found chewed a piece of ginger. They believed ginger smell make honeybees lethargic and incapable for sting. Once the bees leave the combs, the combs sliced from the base using sharp knife or by ‘panio/panyau’ (rice serving flat spoon).Most beekeepers (90%) leave one comb in hive for the honeybees as the food sources and broods. They believed that if all combharvested, bees abscond the hive. Harvested combs included the both honey stored and brood (Fig. 3). As presented in Fig. 4, majority of the farmer (74%) were found practices harvesting honey in two times in a year, once at March to May and second September to November. Similarly, less than one-fourth farmers (22%) were found practices harvesting honey three times and very less farmers (4%) harvested more than three times in a year. They squeezed honey store part of comb and stored for future use. Brood part as well as pollen store part consumed immediately sharing with family and neighbour. The priority time to harvest honey was given in full moon or new moon times because they believed harvesting at that times gives more honey. Similarly, honey was found the most important hive product. They also consumed stored pollen and brood in the comb and brood whereas generally they did not use other hive product. Thapa (2003) also reported that farmer harvest two times in a year in different parts of Nepal whereas Kafle (1992) reported that farmers harvest honey three times in a year. According to Kafle (1992) during honey harvesting the combs are cut down along with the brood. Further he reported that the brood and honey parts are separated and the honey combs are pressed to squeeze out the honey. Saville and Upadhaya (2002) also reported the almost similar harvesting procedure at Jumla, Nepal.


Fig. 3. 
Harvested combs with the honey stored, pollen and brood in Nepal.


Fig. 4. 
Times of honey harvesting in a year at Chyangli VDC, Gorkha, 2015/016.

Management of honeybees

In surveyed areas, keeping two-three bee hives of A. cerana in a farmer house in traditional log bee hives with least management practices were found. Farmers were found beekeeping with A. cerana based on very low investment and insignificant management practices. Joshi et al. (2002) also mentionedthat beekeeping with A. cerana required very low initial investment and colony management cost also very negligible as compared to A. mellifera. Beekeeping with A. cerana does not require a lot of management like sugar feeding, disease control and migration (Gurung et al., 2002). Similarly, it is reported that in hilly areas A. cerana found rearing with no any adopted colony migration and very negligible sugar feeding system (Pokhrel, 2008). According to Kafle (1992) almost no management practices were done rearing with A. cerana in traditional hives.

Problems of beekeeping

Among the different problems absconding was reported as themajor problem. As presented on Fig. 5 majority of the respondents (58%) perceived that absconding behaviour of honeybees as the most serious problem of beekeeping with A. cerana. Generally honeybees did not inhabit in hive more than two year. Likewise, honeybees were found suffered by different insect pests (28%) was another problem. Among the pests different types of ants, lizards, vespa and wasps were primary. Similarly, declining of honeybee colonies in natural condition as compare to past was another problem (10%). Unavailability of nesting sides, pollen and nectar sources, over use and misuse of chemical pesticide were major causes on declining of honeybee colonies in natural condition (Pudasaini, 2014). Declining of bee colonies in natural condition causes difficulty on searching them in natural condition. Dying of mass number of bees at the time of harvesting (4%) was another problem. Thapa (2003) also mentioned two Vespa species (Vespa basalis and V. magnifica) as major pests in A. cerana in Nepal. It is reported that wasps and ants were most troublesome pest of bee colonies in the traditional hives (Kafle, 1992). Similarly, farmers perceived that due to misuse of chemical pesticide, deforestation and other many different factors, population of honeybee is being declined than past in Chitwan condition (Pudasaini et al., 2016).


Fig. 5. 
Problems of beekeeping with A. cerana on Chyangli VDC, Gorkha, in 2015/06.


CONCLUSION

It is concluded that keeping two-three bee hives of A. cerana in a house in traditional log bee hives with least management practices was found common. These techniques of beekeeping have been handed from generation to generation since immemorial time. The indigenous knowledges and practices could be significant basis for development of modern beekeeping in the rural parts of Nepal. Hence, further studies related to beekeeping practicesare need for sustainable beekeeping development.


References
1. Ahmad, F., S. R. Joshi, M. B. Gurung, (2002), Retreating Wild Honeybee Populations and Livelihoods of Himalayan Farmers, Paper presented at the “6th Asian Apiculture Association International Conference” held from 24 February-1 March 2002, Bangalore, India.?, (Retrieved from: http://www.icimod.org/q=1509).
2. B. B. C. (British Broadcasting Corporation), (2009), Baby Rites, Updated on 24 August 2009, (Retrived from http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/ritesrituals/baby.shtml).
3. Devkota, F. P., (2000), Comparative pollination behavior of Apis cerana F. and A. mellifera L. on brocauli and their impact on seed production, Master Thesis, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
4. Entomology Division, (1999), Annual technical report (1998-1999), Nepal Agriculture Research Council, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal, p64.
5. Etkin, N. L., (1993), Anthropological methods in ethnopharmacology, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 38, p93-104.
6. Gurung, M. B., F. Ahmad, and S. R. Joshi, (2002), Sustainable Management of Beekeeping in Nepal: An Effort of ICIMOD’s Project Entitled “Indigenous Honeybees in the Himalayas” presented at 6th Asian Apiculture Association International Conference held from 24 February - 1 March 2002, Bangalore, India.
7. Gurung, M. B., U. Partap, N. C. T. D. Shrestha, H. K. Sharma, N. Islam, and N. B. Tamang, (2012), Beekeeping Training for farmers in the Himalayas, International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, GPO Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal, p178.
8. Joshi, S. R., (2008), Honey in Nepal Approach, Strategy and Intervention for Subsector Promotion, Deutsche Gesellschaftfur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH German Technical Cooperation/Private Sector Promotion-Rural Finance Nepal (GTZ/PSP-RUFIN) p48, (Retrieve from: http://www.fao.org/sustainable-food-value-chains/library/details/en/c/263471/).
9. Joshi, S.R., F. Ahmad, and M. B. Gurung, (2001), Participatory action research on Apis cerana selection and multiplication in Nepal. Mountain Agriculture in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Proceedings of an International Symposium held May 21-24, 2001 in Kathmandu, Nepal.
10. Joshi, S. R., F. Ahmad, and M. B. Gurung, (2002), Retreating Indigenous Bee Populations (Apis cerana) and Livelihoods of Himalayan Farmer, presented at the “6th Asian Apiculture Association International Conference” held from 24 February-1 March 2002, Bangalore, India.
11. Kafle, G. P., (1992), Salient features of beekeeping in Nepal, In: Verma, L.R. (ed), Honeybees in mountain agriculture, New Delhi, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., p155-162.
12. Krueger, R. A., (1988), Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, In: Focus Groups and Ethnography Edited by Agar, M, and MacDonald, Journal of Human Organization, 54, p87-94.
13. MoAC (Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives), (2008), Directorate of Industrial Entomology department, Government of Nepal Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Kathmandu. Nepal.
14. Munawar, S. M., S. Raja, M. Siddique, S. Niaz, and M. Amjad, (2009), The pollination by honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) increases yield of canola (Brassica napus L.), Pakistan Entomology Journal, 31(2), p103-106.
15. Oldroyd, B. P., and S. Wongsiri, (2006), Asian honey bees: biology, conservation, and human interactions, Harvard University Press, p224 In: Gulzar, A. N., T. R. Shah, K. Muzaffar, S. A. Wani, A. Gull, I. Majid, and F. M. Bhat, (2014), Honey: its history and religious significance: a review, Universal Journal of Pharmacy, 03(01), p5-8.
16. Partap, U., (1997), Bee flora of the Hindu Kush Himalayas, inventory and management, ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, p298.
17. Partap, U., (1999), Pollination management of mountain crops through beekeeping. Trainers’ resource Book, ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, p117.
18. Partap, U., and L. R. Verma, (2010), Pollination of radish by Apis cerana F, Journal of Apicultural Research, 33(4), p237-24.
19. Partap, U., and T. Partap, (1997), Managed crop pollination. The missing dimension of mountain crop productivity, Discussion paper series No. MFS 97/1, ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal, p26.
20. Pokhrel, S., (2008), The ecological problems and possible solutions of beekeeping in hills and Terai of Chitwan, Nepal, Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 9, p23-33.
21. Pokhrel, S., (2009), Comparative benefits of beekeeping enterprise in Chitwan, Nepal, The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 10, p49-50.
22. Pudasaini, R., (2014), Abundance of flower visiting insects in rapeseed (Brassicacampestris L. var. toria) field affected by the distance of natural habitat, Sky Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(11), p223-227.
23. Pudasaini, R., and R. B. Thapa, (2014a), Effect of pollination on rapeseed (Brassica campestris l. var. toria) production in Chitwan, Nepal, The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 15, p41-45.
24. Pudasaini, R., and R. B. Thapa, (2014b), Foraging behavior of different bee species under cage and open condition in Chitwan, Nepal, New York Science Journal, 7(8), p94-97.
25. Pudasaini, R., R. B. Thapa, and S. Tiwari, (2016), Farmers perception on effect of pesticide on insect pollinators at Padampur and Jutpani VDCs, Chitwan, Nepal, International Journal of Applied Science and Biotechnology, 4, p64-66.
26. Pudasaini, R., R. B. Thapa, P. R. Poudel, (2014), Effect of Pollination on Qualitative Characteristics of Rapeseed (Brassica campestris L. var. toria) Seed in Chitwan, Nepal, International Journal of Biology, Forestry, Veterinary and Agriculture, 8, p1278-1281.
27. Ranabhat, N.B., (2010), Beekeeping: Indigenous Practice in the Mid-hills of Nepal, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co., KG., Germany, In: Adhikari, S., and N. B. Ranabhat, (2011), Bee flora in mid hills of Central Nepal. Journal of Plant Science, 8, p45-56.
28. Robinson, W. E., and R. A. Morse, (1989), The value of honeybees as pollinators of US crops, American Bee Journal, 129(1), p477-487.
29. Saville, N., and S. N. Upadhaya, (2002), Indigenous knowledge of beekeeping in Jumla, West Nepal, (Retrieved fromhttp://www.apiservices.biz/en/articles/sort-bypopularity/799-indigenous-knowledge-of-beekeepingin-jumla-western-nepal-2002).
30. Thapa, R., (2003), Himalayan honey bees and beekeeping in Nepal, Apiacta, 30, p51-55, (Retrieved from https://www.apimondia.com/apiacta/slovenia/en/thapa.pdf).
31. Verma, L. R., (1992), Honeybees in Mountain Agriculture, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, p274.